Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Apr 2007 22:00 UTC, submitted by michuk
Graphics, User Interfaces "Red Hat has recently shared with the world the first ISO images of the system that is supposed to be installed on the OLPC laptops. I suddenly felt an irresistible temptation. I downloaded 291 MB ISO, burned it on a CD and started testing. Here is what I got."
Thread beginning with comment 229509
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Hehehe...
by shykid on Wed 11th Apr 2007 07:50 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Hehehe..."
shykid
Member since:
2007-02-22

They are not stupider in the sense that they are less intelligent; however, they are less likely to be literate, and AFAIK, SugarUI focuses on removing text as much as possible.

Obviously, the lack of text makes it easier for someone illiterate to learn to use (and a lot of these kids may even learn to read on their OLPC, contrary to most first-world children who learn to read somewhat before using a computer or have mommy/daddy help them). Flooding a visual child with (verbal) text is difficult (not to mention discouraging) for them--it's similar to giving a technology-ignorant person with no interest in computers one without an OS or documentation and saying "Figure it out".

SugarUI's textlessness also makes translating it into other languages much easier. Translating a UI into a multitude of developing languages (and not using any terms, but kid-friendly ones) would be horrendously difficult.

I guess it's a miracle we have computers at all today seeing as my generation learned computers using C64 basic, assembler and such, eh?

It most likely took you a little while to learn BASIC and ASM, and I'm almost certain you knew how to read when you learned them. The OLPC is intended for its children to be able to "just use them" in no time.

People are missing the point of OLPC. It is not designed to be "just another computer"--it is designed to be a learning tool above all else. It's true that it will likely foster an interest in computers amongst its users, and if these children are as intelligent as their first-world counterparts (and they are, like you said), then learning another, more conventional UI will be easy to them.

Edited 2007-04-11 07:52

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[4]: Hehehe...
by devurandom on Wed 11th Apr 2007 08:53 in reply to "RE[3]: Hehehe..."
devurandom Member since:
2005-07-06

They are not stupider in the sense that they are less intelligent; however, they are less likely to be literate, and AFAIK, SugarUI focuses on removing text as much as possible.

This makes no sense at all. If they are not literate, what's the purpose of a web browser or a word processor on that machine?

If they are literate enough to browse the web and to write documents, they are surely literate enought to read text tooltips, for example.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Hehehe...
by shykid on Wed 11th Apr 2007 10:30 in reply to "RE[4]: Hehehe..."
shykid Member since:
2007-02-22

Literacy is not required to use the camera, drawing, or ad-hoc social networking (because it uses the aforementioned), nor is literacy required to play the simple games that come with it.

It's designed to grow with them; eventually textual applications will be useful for them as they learn.

Edited 2007-04-11 10:31

Reply Parent Score: 4