Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Thu 12th Apr 2007 00:49 UTC, submitted by Dan Warne
Thread beginning with comment 230067
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
I agree with you. Yak8998 was talking about the number large custom software apps as locking users into the WindowsOS platforms. But if the work to move the old software from XP to Vista is too great, then you open up the opportunity to suggest porting the code to an entire different OS as being just as cost affective as Vista, especially if the alternative OS offers a number of savings.
When you add the cost of Vista and the hardware to support it you MAY (note I said 'may') find it cheaper to go elsewhere.
Linux for example may let you get away without upgrading any hardware and very low costs for the OS even on CD.
Macs have gotten cheap enough in some models to make it worth the cost to go that direction rather than the cost of upgrades or a computer to run Vista.
And a number of the other OSes (Sun, IBM, etc) out there offer features that are not in high demand over-all but if they turn out to match your business needs you may start considering them if the natural path of upgrades starts lokking expensive.