Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th Apr 2007 18:32 UTC, submitted by rx182
Thread beginning with comment 230186
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: I hate to say we told ya so....
by BluenoseJake on Thu 12th Apr 2007 21:45
in reply to "RE: I hate to say we told ya so...."
RE[2]: I hate to say we told ya so....
by gonzo on Fri 13th Apr 2007 03:42
in reply to "RE: I hate to say we told ya so...."






Member since:
2005-07-06
I knew that entire story was unsubstantiated crap.
It's not crap until its actually released, given how long it has actually been delayed. Microsoft has had a habit of having things on product roadmaps, only to turn around later and say "After extensive customer feedback we realised that a further service pack was not necessary, and it technically wasn't possible to roll all the fixes we had planned for Vista into Windows XP".
They pulled that stunt with Windows 2000, where they came up with totally unspecified technical reasons as to why they couldn't provide reasonable updates for it.
Thurrot was spot on. I'll believe it when I see it.