Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Apr 2007 16:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 231044
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Bill gives enough money on charity, dont you thi
by twenex on Sun 15th Apr 2007 00:27
in reply to "RE[5]: Bill gives enough money on charity, dont you thi"
But where did the money come from for that research. Yes companies who's practices weren't open. I believe AT&T was the father of UNIX, and they are hardly close to an open company. So don't get up on your high horse and pretend to be above everybody, you are using software that may be open, but the research was bought by the proprietary software you now speak against.
And when did it all start to go wrong for UNIX? When it was made proprietary?
RE[7]: Bill gives enough money on charity, dont you thi
by nberardi on Sun 15th Apr 2007 00:55
in reply to "RE[6]: Bill gives enough money on charity, dont you thi"
And when did it all start to go wrong for UNIX? When it was made proprietary?
UNIX was always proprietary, maybe you should re-read your history http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix , it wasn't until Berkley decided to make BSD that the UNIX idea emerged from the proprietary idea. Then from BSD emerged NetBSD, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, and Solaris. Then Linus came a long and took the same UNIX ideas and made Linux.
But in the beginning UNIX was a commercial product for commercial purposes and AT&T licensed it out for many years until SCO bought the rights to the license during the break up of AT&T.
So with out the funding of mega proprietary organizations like AT&T and GE UNIX would never exist. So do us all a favor at OSNews and read a book or at least a wikipedia article.





Member since:
2005-07-10
But where did the money come from for that research. Yes companies who's practices weren't open. I believe AT&T was the father of UNIX, and they are hardly close to an open company. So don't get up on your high horse and pretend to be above everybody, you are using software that may be open, but the research was bought by the proprietary software you now speak against.