Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sun 15th Apr 2007 20:11 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source "We're now more than a decade later than the moment when I judged the open source to have gained a decisive momentum - 1996-1997, when Slackware was the reference, Red Hat was 'the other choice', KDE and GNOME were just emerging, Walnut Creek was selling CD-ROMs, and SunSITE mirrors were the home of most of the relevant software. The worst thing that happened was that Yggdrasil Linux died. But the Earth kept spinning..." Read the rest of the editorial at TheJemReport.
Thread beginning with comment 231278
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: GLP vs BSD
by Almafeta on Mon 16th Apr 2007 04:37 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: GLP vs BSD"
Almafeta
Member since:
2007-02-22

Again, for those that dislike the license, don't use the software.

Which people seem to be doing more and more every day. ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: -2

RE[4]: GLP vs BSD
by raver31 on Mon 16th Apr 2007 07:00 in reply to "RE[3]: GLP vs BSD"
raver31 Member since:
2005-07-06

Here we go again with one of your lame attempts at FUD....

BACK UP your statememts with some firgures, or examples, or at least a link..

Otherwise, people will continue to treat you as a troll.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[5]: GLP vs BSD
by Almafeta on Mon 16th Apr 2007 14:57 in reply to "RE[4]: GLP vs BSD"
Almafeta Member since:
2007-02-22

Here we go again with one of your lame attempts at FUD

Why do many users here automatically dismiss all criticisms of the GPL/copyleft as "FUD", often with a few personal attacks thrown in, without even any sign that they had considered or even read the arguments presented them?

As to your question, the fact that people are not using GPL software is enormously evident. Windows costs much more than Linux, yet the former is still a multi-billion dollar product and the latter can't even approach the marketshare of Mac OSX. Microsoft Office costs hundreds (maybe thousands) of dollars more than Koffice or OpenOffice, and yet the Word, Excel, and PowerPoint formats are still standard. Photoshop costs hundreds of dollars more than GIMP, yet employers never look for experience in the latter on resumes. The only thing all these products that have not been adopted have in common is the fact that they are licensed under copyleft licenses.

People who see the GPL for what is don't use software licensed under it. Even in those instances when said software can do everything that the proprietary or free program can do, but at the price of $0, people are paying the hundreds or thousands of dollars it takes to be free of GPL code, and they're doing it by the millions. This isn't ignorance -- this is knowing the license.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3