To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
At least, that's the plan.
If that were the plan, wouldn't they be misserved by making Silverlight usable with Safari and Firefox?
There's an interesting quote on the Microsoft website: "[Microsoft makes] more software for the Mac than anyone other than Apple itself." Much as I don't like it, it looks like this is another 'baby step' towards being in that same position with Linux.
A few weeks ago, someone here (don't know who, there's no 'search comment' feature for non-paying users) commented that Microsoft should be moving towards a common cross-platform business, using their ability to create APIs and IDEs to sell Microsoft software to people regardless of OS. By putting out another Linux product, it looks like could be going in that direction...
If that were the plan, wouldn't they be misserved by making Silverlight usable with Safari and Firefox?
You would think so, but MS's embrace/extend/extinguish strategy works slightly different than that.
A few weeks ago, someone here (don't know who, there's no 'search comment' feature for non-paying users) commented that Microsoft should be moving towards a common cross-platform business, using their ability to create APIs and IDEs to sell Microsoft software to people regardless of OS. By putting out another Linux product, it looks like could be going in that direction...
That would be interesting (and logical) but I dont see that happening with Gates/Ballmer in control of that company.
There's an interesting quote on the Microsoft website: "[Microsoft makes] more software for the Mac than anyone other than Apple itself.
Let's see, there is the Office suite and ... ?! I'd venture to say that many Mac ISVs make more than 1 product for the Mac. They used to have a few more products for the Mac, but they are all discontinued one after another.
Even if you count the components of the Office suite as separate products, Adobe still makes more applications for the Mac than Microsoft.
Why subvert HTML? This is a vector graphics user interface markup language that we're talking about here, not a light document markup standard.
Where I see a "subversion" of HTML by Silverlight is when it starts to compete with Flash to see who can create the largest website with an all-vector markup, as is the standard with, say, music band websites.
The problem with that is that, with so much concentration on graphics, we'll have more of those sites which are damn near impossible to navigate with your browser's "Back"/"Forward" buttons.
Plus, if there's any evidence of Microsoft spiting Desktop Linux (not server Linux) users, then this might be the first shot.
I'm hoping that SVG doesn't turn out exactly like Flash or Silverlight in their utter denial of the existence of a "navigational-through-documents" web browser.
"The web isn't a big user interface. It's a series of (text) links!"
Nothing will subvert HTML. IT is too easy to write, too light and too ubiquitous to get rid of.
MS's product is going after the rich UI market on web pages... providing a highly interactive interface that is competitive with flash and ajax toolkits will be beneficial. If silverlight can beat flash in its features and platform ubiquity, then people will start using sliverlight toolkits to make UIs rather than Flash.
Personally, I think that using flash applets for specific site functions like streaming media, file uploading, etc. is as far as you should go with a flash UI. Too much and you create an unusable (but pretty) experience.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Since Microsoft has always been rather uncomfortable about Flash and its pre-installed status, they created their own version in order to try and subvert HTML and open web standards even more than they already have. Should this ever take off, the development of non-Windows version of this will be slowed down dramatically or stopped in order to try and kill the notion of the web on non-Windows platforms. At least, that's the plan.