Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Apr 2007 22:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 231774
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Sometimes I wished MacOS X worked like GNUStep does (I know it used to).
Hmm, I need some elightment about this. I found that Cocoa along with XCode is working very well. GNUStep = Cocoa - Aqua (that's ugly). And I experienced that installing GNUStep requires big effort, like Aaron Hillegass said in his book.
GNUStep seems to be based more directly on NeXT/OPENStep, while OS X took some inspiration from those, but on a lot of points felt they could do better and made a bunch of changes. OS X has been diverging more and more over the years. Many times those changes where for the better and sometimes (in my opinion) not.







Member since:
2006-01-28
GNUStep was my primary environment for a year: then I got a Mac. I am setting up an email server now, and if I need a GUI for some reason, I will use the GNUStep environment again. I love it for its simplicity and speed. Its the one DE that I did not need to force to my workflow.
Used it when GNOME was trashier), and blackbox(when all I did was code. Its wonderful for that... keeps you focused, but a pain to configure).
I've used XFCE (Made it look like BeOS), GNOME(I only like it with XFWM as the manager), KDE (ugh!
Sometimes I wished MacOS X worked like GNUStep does (I know it used to).