To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Sure, it's possible. There are really only 3 major BSDs: Free, Open, and Net. And if you really want cover 99.99% of the BSD market, add in Dragonfly. I would think there would be a way to release a plugin that runs on all those BSDs.
If not, just release it for FreeBSD, since that appears to have the largest userbase. I'm sure some enterprising souls in the other BSD camps could figure out a way to get a FreeBSD Flash plugin to work on their operating systems.
So: Adobe could create a single Flash plugin that works on these BSD's, or just release one for FreeBSD. Either one would be nice.
This is nice for PC-BSD, but I really wish Adobe would release a native Flash plugin for the *BSDs in general.
Why?
There's nothing wrong the the *BSDs linux compatibility layer. This is what it is for, to run the binary only junk that is targeted at Linux (which is has a much bigger *audience than the BSDs combined I'm afraid).
Its not like there is a noticable performance hit by using it. If you have an example of why a "native binary" would be useful, I'd like to hear it.
If you have an example of why a "native binary" would be useful, I'd like to hear it.
Many:
- Better support for sound
- More stability
- Less memory and CPU usage
- Less space usage on the CD-ROM
- No hack found on the web to have browsers work seemlessly with the plugin
Using the Linux Compat is no fun at all.
Why? Are you serious? Because using Flash with the Linux compatibility layer, frankly, sucks. It's a hack. The Flash Plugin 7 works ok with Opera, but frequently crashes with Firefox and other browsers. And Flash 9 doesn't really work at all on any browser. Just cruise over to bsdforums.org and check out the many posts about Flash problems.





Member since:
2005-06-29
This is nice for PC-BSD, but I really wish Adobe would release a native Flash plugin for the *BSDs in general.