Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Apr 2007 19:05 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 232546
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Because a FUSE driver wouldn't have to link to the GPLed kernel and would consequently not present a license conflict. Also, there was already work in progress on a FUSE ZFS impl for last year's GSoC, though I have no idea how far that progressed in the end.
Update: Err, missed the actual point. The FUSE driver could, due to the lack of license issues, use the actual ZFS code, which would prevent the patent issue from cropping up.
Edited 2007-04-20 19:31 UTC






Member since:
2006-02-06
First of all a disclaimer: This is not an attempt to bash the parent post, but a genuine question.
How would it be that building a FUSE driver would solve the patents issue ?