Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Apr 2007 20:32 UTC, submitted by irbis
Sun Solaris, OpenSolaris "If you're an OpenSolaris x86 user and are using a NVIDIA graphics card with NVIDIA's binary Solaris drivers, you can now enjoy Compiz on your desktop. Erwann Chenede has produced packages of Compiz 0.5.0 for OpenSolaris x86. In fact, to ease the process he has even written an OpenSolaris install script for Compiz. More information (download links) is available from Erwann's Sun Blog."
Thread beginning with comment 233639
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: OpenSolaris, more unix than unix
by mohasr on Tue 24th Apr 2007 20:54 UTC
mohasr
Member since:
2006-07-14

"""
Nice to see that now I can run compiz on my server
"""
OpenSolaris is not for the servers only anymore. You can run it on your desktop as well.

kajaman Member since:
2006-01-06

> OpenSolaris is not for the servers only anymore. You can run it on your desktop as well.

Yeah, I tried. There are still problems with it. That is why I am so happy that Sun hired Ian Murdock and I hope they incorporate dpkg into their system to make management and configuration easier. Solaris needs to offer more flexibility for users, just like most Linux distros do. Now it is big, coherent environment, where it is hard to remove anything... and it is similar to Windows in this area. Personally, I prefer Linux's flexibility.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

AlexandreAM Member since:
2006-02-06

I'm a linux guy too, but I really would like to see a unix variant become desktop ready and still have the tracks set by a single corporation. Not saying it would be better than linux, but it would be a good thing nonetheless.

And I don't mean Mac OS X, as those are too expensive here in Brazil.

Unfortunately, from what I heard and read, OpenSolaris still has a long long way to go. Let's see how it ends.

I just would love if Sun could come up with a great system with a nice standard UI and solid release based version of libraries, so developers would have a still target if they wanted to develop for an Open Unix Variant in Desktop.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

Robert Escue Member since:
2005-07-08

What is hard to remove? I have never had any problems with pkgrm. And what is this flexibility you speak of that Linux has and Solaris doesn't.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

binarycrusader Member since:
2005-07-06

> OpenSolaris is not for the servers only anymore. You can run it on your desktop as well.

Yeah, I tried. There are still problems with it. That is why I am so happy that Sun hired Ian Murdock and I hope they incorporate dpkg into their system to make management and configuration easier. Solaris needs to offer more flexibility for users, just like most Linux distros do. Now it is big, coherent environment, where it is hard to remove anything... and it is similar to Windows in this area. Personally, I prefer Linux's flexibility.


Well you had better get unhappy because Ian being hired at Sun has absolutely nothing to do with Solaris. As far as "Linux's flexibility." That's a lie. It depends on what distribution you're using. Not only that, you make it sound like you can't remove packages from a Solaris system and still have it work, which isn't true at all. There are required ones yes, but not all of them are required (most them are not I would venture to say).

Also, adding dpkg wouldn't do much for management and configuration. Solaris' built in package manager is just as capable as dpkg. What you're looking for is apt4pkg.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

aliquis Member since:
2005-07-23

Yeah, it's just that it's not very good for it yet.

Call me when a decent package manager + servers, kde port, e17 port, oss support in all packages and the os itself are there.

Seems to be the sweetest server os out there thought (and probably as development desktop aswelll.)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1