Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 25th Apr 2007 10:18 UTC
A month ago I wrote a review on Ubuntu's 7.04 version and in it I promised a second look once the final version was to released. Feisty Fawn was released last week and as it seems so far, it is one of the most (if not the most) successful Linux distro release ever. This means that we can't help it but compare it with XP and Mac OS X, after having tested it in 3 laptops and 2 desktops in my lab.
Thread beginning with comment 233786
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: This is not a review of Ubuntu
by Eugenia on Wed 25th Apr 2007 08:47
in reply to "RE[2]: This is not a review of Ubuntu"
Member since:2005-06-28
You didn't understand it right (English is not my first language anyways). The "comparing" part that was specifically mentioned in that paragraph was about the "which OS would have shipped with what bug", and it was NOT a generic comparison of OSes on all levels. I really thought I made that clear, sorry if it wasn't.
Edited 2007-04-25 08:49
RE[4]: This is not a review of Ubuntu
by flanque on Wed 25th Apr 2007 09:07
in reply to "RE[3]: This is not a review of Ubuntu"
Member since:2005-12-15
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-11-20
Maybe I'm reading it to fast, sure, but if You titled it:
"Linux needs beter ACPI and video drivers" I would say no word, but I saw this "compare it with XP and Mac OS X" and after reading whole thing I scratched my head and thought that it's not too much compared in it (a least for my understanding of "comparision").
Anyway it's never too much of pointing that something is broken in Linux or any other OS, if people won't complain it will stay broken.