Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 25th Apr 2007 10:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 233949
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
If Kubuntu was so terrible, it wouldn't be so widely used. I truly believe this, particularly as it's FOSS software and there's no sort of lockin or unfair competition.

There's a REASON Mandrake/Mandriva isn't king of the hill anymore. The same goes for Suse.
Why?
Well, I think there are a ton of factors - maybe marketing is one of them.
The biggest thing for me was a low barrier to entry (particularly back in the Warty days, Debian had a reputation as a more advanced user's distro) and amazing package management - I LOVE Apt.
Kubuntu was never that bad to me...And I used it full time for over a year (Hoary to Dapper, I think).
AS for less polished...I've never had a smoother, quicker, and simpler experience than with Ubuntu Feisty...And I've used A LOT of distros commercial and non, on more than a few different machines.
The codec/plugin/restricted drivers installation actually clinched it for me and I've since replaced XP COMPLETELY.
I was almost dissapointed that my new comp took less than an hour to fool with to get it running the way I wanted. Almost