Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Thu 26th Apr 2007 17:13 UTC, submitted by Arnold
Thread beginning with comment 234202
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: localized versions?
by stestagg on Thu 26th Apr 2007 22:17
in reply to "RE: localized versions?"
This makes so much more sense than the OSS default method of shipping everything. Even with relatively fast internet connections, the wastage involved with downloading (and sometimes forcing the install of) multiple language sets when only one is needed, seems stupid to me.
On a related note, even Minix 3 now ships with a whole range of applications. I wanted to try out some basic stuff on Minix but was forced to download (I'm not going to build from sources) about 300MB of unwanted software as part of the CD image. I'm not going to install X11, why force me to download it?
Why can't all distros throw together a basic netinst type installer, like the debian one.
</rant>






Member since:
2005-07-06
Vista and "Longhorn" Server binaries are language-neutral, but the resources for each language can be very large, so SKUs are distributed including the localization for the regions in which they are sold, but additional languages are made available via downloadable Language Packs (MUIs - Enterprise/Ultimate or LIPs - All SKUs).
More info: http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/85e289ca-9fd8...