Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Apr 2007 12:46 UTC, submitted by nicholas
Thread beginning with comment 235675
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
>Actually it's not. Hyperion has confirmed that it is not on a number of occaisions.
That's not entirely entirely the case either, I believe. Hyperion had access to the 3.1 sources, although it's true that a large amount was rewritten (notably the kernel, ExecSG, and AmigaDOS, which was previously written in legacy BCPL.) What Hyperion didn't have access to were the sources for OS3.5, OS3.9, and (as far as I recollect) ARexx.







Member since:
2006-05-14
What name followers Nicholas? The pure facts: AmigaOS4 is based on the original AmigaOS3.1 sources, while MorphOS is a wannabe AmigaOS, a clone, which has similar functionalities.
This is not following the name, this is following the original AmigaOS codebase instead of using some OS which has only a mere compatibility layer. (Or what is Quark kernel and ABox is about?)
Regarding the original topic: the result of this legal action is rather questionable. After Eyetech stopped producing AmigaOne motherboards Amiga INC refused to grant the license to any hardware platform to run AmigaOS4 on for years.
I find it interesting what the judge is going to say after getting familiar with the original contract. (Which was leaked some time ago, so we all know what it was about.)
Amiga is cursed with utterly incompetent management since the Commodore days. It seems the name demands.