Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Apr 2007 12:46 UTC, submitted by nicholas
Amiga & AROS Amiga, Inc. has terminated the contract with Hyperion and Eyetech on 20th December, and has sued Hyperion for copyright infringement on 26th April. Discussion about this trademark suit can be read on AmigaWorld; maybe the community can clear up what is going on here, because I lost track long ago. Update: A detailed description [.pdf] of the suit has appeared. Amiga Inc. is accusing Hyperion of trademark infringement, but also of breach of the agreement the companies signed among one another. According to Amiga Inc., the agreement said that Hyperion would exercise its 'best efforts' to release AmigaOS 4 by March 1st, 2002. They obviously failed that date (AOS4 was released 24th December 2006), and hence Amiga Inc. says the contract was broken. Exhibits included.
Thread beginning with comment 235745
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Name followers
by jsutton on Mon 30th Apr 2007 17:45 UTC in reply to "RE: Name followers"
jsutton
Member since:
2006-03-24

The pure facts: AmigaOS4 is based on the original AmigaOS3.1 sources


Actually it's not. Hyperion has confirmed that it is not on a number of occaisions.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[3]: Name followers
by alex on Mon 30th Apr 2007 18:03 in reply to "RE[2]: Name followers"
alex Member since:
2005-07-06

>Actually it's not. Hyperion has confirmed that it is not on a number of occaisions.

That's not entirely entirely the case either, I believe. Hyperion had access to the 3.1 sources, although it's true that a large amount was rewritten (notably the kernel, ExecSG, and AmigaDOS, which was previously written in legacy BCPL.) What Hyperion didn't have access to were the sources for OS3.5, OS3.9, and (as far as I recollect) ARexx.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: Name followers
by racs on Mon 30th Apr 2007 18:12 in reply to "RE[3]: Name followers"
racs Member since:
2006-05-14

Exactly. Some parts needed to be rewritten from scratch, such as Exec (the heart of the OS), which needed to be adapted to the PowerPC processor and more flexible hardware handling. Numerous parts were added to handle new hardware and software environment such as USB, IDE/SATA devices, etc. And many parts are bugfixed and/or developed further from the 3.1 sources such as DOS.library, Graphics.library, etc.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2