To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I doubt it will be that much cheaper. As has been reported many times previously, the OEM rate for Windows is very low and most or all of it is offset by the "crapware" loaded on it. If you add to this the investment they have to put in in testing and altering hardware, training people for the linux install, it will possibly be more expensive (at least initially). But there are two optimistic scenarios (a) they decide not to pass everything onto the consumer and just treat their costs as an investment to get into a new market (b) they might find crapware to install on these machines just like any Windows machine e.g. something like the Google pack deal or Real Player should be happy to get on. Which means some of us might have to spend some time getting rid of junk but at least we will get cheaper machines.
Why exactly would the Linux option be cheaper when Dell makes a profit from the programs that come pre-installed on their systems, and they also have to add further steps into their manufacturing process and testing process to support and preinstall Linux? I don't see K3B, OpenOffice.org, etc etc paying Dell the money that companies like Symantec, Real Networks, etc etc pay Dell.
I'd actually be surprised if the Linux option was cheaper. Would be nice though.






Member since:
2005-07-06
if it will be like the "N" series, where the exact same computer with windows was 100 bucks cheaper AND it came with an LCD monitor.
the main thing for me is seeing some sort of palpable savings on the windows/linux front, I'm not looking to see a huge difference in cost, but $40 - $50 bucks would be reasonable.