Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 6th May 2007 17:39 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 237794
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So it's IceWeasel all over again?
Yep, it sure is:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422527#10






Member since:
2005-07-06
Let me get this straight: The author wants the name of the WM to refer to his codebase with no additions like Ion3v462007. And any off shoots are either not to use the name or to clearly spell out they are not Ion3. Okay, seems OK. A little annoying but fair since its his name.
Where the crunch comes in is in when somebody does a patch that changes Ion3 in a significant way. You need the approval of the author to do this since, in this theory, makes it not purely Ion3. This seems to take things a bit far and this is what OpenBSD is adjecting to.