Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th May 2007 13:19 UTC
Months go, I reviewed Windows Vista, and concluded: "All in all, I am impressed by Windows Vista [...]. Windows Vista is better than XP, and definitely more than just an improved look as many say." After 5 months of usage, it is time to put that statement into perspective.
Thread beginning with comment 238377
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-06-29
To say that Vista has a better implementation of backup because it doesn't require the use of a secondary drive is just bad journalism
If you are an 'IT Pro' *cough* than you would know that Previous Versions/Volume Shadow Copy can also backup to external or additional hard drives.
Member since:2005-04-01
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2007-05-08
As an IT pro, I must say I prefer my backups on a secondary drive or optical disc. What good is a local backup if the drive physically bombs? To say that Vista has a better implementation of backup because it doesn't require the use of a secondary drive is just bad journalism. I understand this is an opinion piece, so it should be taken with a grain of salt. I've used both Vista and Leopard in beta and say I haven't seen a compelling reason for me to use Vista yet.