Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th May 2007 13:19 UTC
Windows Months go, I reviewed Windows Vista, and concluded: "All in all, I am impressed by Windows Vista [...]. Windows Vista is better than XP, and definitely more than just an improved look as many say." After 5 months of usage, it is time to put that statement into perspective.
Thread beginning with comment 238521
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: I agree, fair review
by cyclops on Tue 8th May 2007 19:52 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: I agree, fair review"
Member since:

sorry I don't really understand your statement. Vista had *more* DRM than every before.

It is true I can only play DRM unencumbered HD content. But you can save your money on Vista Ultimate+Blu-ray drive and buy a PS3 and have your computer run 33% faster. Or wait a couple of years and the player from your serial box.

I do not think in any way I imagine the significance of WGA/OGA/Activatation etc they are awful, and please could you reference that percentage, because that figure seems a little high, Linux adoption rate is a long way from hitting figures as high as that.

Reply Parent Score: 3