Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th May 2007 13:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 238532
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: I agree, fair review
by archer75 on Tue 8th May 2007 20:17
in reply to "RE[7]: I agree, fair review"
RE[9]: I agree, fair review
by cyclops on Tue 8th May 2007 20:28
in reply to "RE[8]: I agree, fair review"
RE[9]: I agree, fair review
by Supreme Dragon on Tue 8th May 2007 20:29
in reply to "RE[8]: I agree, fair review"
"All of your articles are old and the EULA has been changed since then. It's obvious you have no understanding of it."
There are more articles, Vista is abhorrent:
http://www.techsphere.org/wordpress/2007/05/08/microsoft-withdraws-...
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39286677,00.htm
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38926
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39087
http://vista.blorge.com/2007/05/08/security-built-in-to-vista-fails...
Edited 2007-05-08 20:37





Member since:
2007-03-04
A computer belongs to it's owner, not MS. Drm/activation/WGA infection is unacceptable:
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=printArticle...
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/02/drm_in_windows.html
http://www.techweb.com/wire/software/167101037
Vista EULA is detestable:
http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/29/microsoft_vista_eula_analys...