To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No point, stare... Supreme Dragon is a troll or an idiot. He kind of reminds me of moulinneuf, but with better grammar and spelling. SD seems to get a lot of amusement by posting the same thing over, and over, and over again and he keeps getting responses every time. Think about it: he wastes almost no time writing his words and often gets an essay back. The economics of this sort of posting are clearly in his favor.
"Mark Russinovich tells how hackers would find a way around UAC through social engineering or by compromising applications that run with higher privileges. Duh. No OS is immune to that."
MS was bragging about how secure Vista was, and now they are backing down on security claims. If security is a priority, MS software is not a good choice.
"Man wrote the tool which can enable/disable protected processes. Requires loading a driver, needs to be running with elevated privileges. If you load bad driver in the kernel that's your fault, not OS. Moreover, that binary doesnt work on 64bit Vista."
DRM allowing malware to be installed is a serious flaw. MS could learn much about security from Linux, they should also remove the DRM.
"Windows Defender didnt detect all running spyware. Not an issue since there should be no spyware in the first place. I never had any malware on my Windows boxes."
No spyware? This is Windows we are talking about, the malware writers favorite OS. Considering what people are paying for Vista, they should be getting much better quality than what MS is giving them.





Member since:
2005-07-06
There are more articles
Lets review them:
http://www.techsphere.org/wordpress/2007/05/08/microsoft-withdraws-.....
Mark Russinovich tells how hackers would find a way around UAC through social engineering or by compromising applications that run with higher privileges.
Duh. No OS is immune to that.
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39286677,00.htm
Man wrote the tool which can enable/disable protected processes. Requires loading a driver, needs to be running with elevated privileges.
If you load bad driver in the kernel that's your fault, not OS. Moreover, that binary doesnt work on 64bit Vista.
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38926
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39087
No comments, typical inq "humorous" BS.
http://vista.blorge.com/2007/05/08/security-built-in-to-vista-fails...
Windows Defender didnt detect all running spyware.
Not an issue since there should be no spyware in the first place. I never had any malware on my Windows boxes.
, Vista is abhorrent:
None of the articles you provided lead to this conclusion, try again.