Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th May 2007 18:17 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 239523
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-01
I applaud intel for creating open source drivers for their chipset video cards; but that doesn't mean the drivers are perfect either.
My Dell 700m, with intel 855gm chipset/video, and running Xorg 1.3 and intel 2.0.0 drivers, still has a lot of problems.
1. beryl/compiz/opencomp are slow (and with older 1.7.4 drivers and Xorg 1.2 they were much faster)
2. only x11 video works, everything else is prone to crash or not display. Basically all video is rendered by the CPU (even though Windows XP drivers render through VMR9 with GPU assistance)
3. random crashes upon resume
The biggest problem is that anything <915GM is basically considered outdated and I don't see any immediate plans for intel to fix these problems.
I would say Nvidia and ATI (and even intel's closed source windows drivers) work a lot better.
Edited 2007-05-11 22:40