Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 12th May 2007 21:40 UTC, submitted by dylansmrjones
Thread beginning with comment 239758
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: The article is correct
by dylansmrjones on Sun 13th May 2007 04:58
in reply to "RE[3]: The article is correct"
nVidia is not circumventing the GPL since the driver isn't under the GPL
The driver core is identical to the windows driver and it doesn't link to the linux kernel. Only the adapter does. All perfectly legal and no circumventing.
I don't know about ati's proprietary drivers, so I'll give you benefit of doubt on that one.
Besides that. Using proprietary software when no usable FLOSS solutions are available does not constitute circumventing the ideals.
The community is thriving, the GPL is growing stronger every day, and proprietary software is losing some of its power every single day. Rejoice dudes! Rejoice!
RE[5]: The article is correct
by JMcCarthy on Sun 13th May 2007 20:15
in reply to "RE[3]: The article is correct"






Member since:
2005-08-12
I'm not saying there is anything wrong with making a profit off of free-software, there is nothing wrong with it as long as profit doesn't come at a sacrifice.
>Nobody is trying to circumvent any ideals or license here.
http://www.nvidia.com/
http://ati.amd.com/
and tons of other hardware manufactures. Then there are things like the prominence of Flash, etc. I'd be surprised if more than 50% of GNU/Linux users were actually for free as in freedom software rather than Windows refugees.