To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
IMO Gconf-editor is perfect for those fifty-million tweaker settings that just turn a GUI config into a complete cluster-fluck. I originally hated the idea. Now that I see the simple, clean GUI preferences compared to old gnome/sawfish I think it is a perfectly implemented tool that provides more info about the selections and more flexibility in settings without just being a crapload of sliders, and radio buttons, and check boxes, and tabs and so forth.
You are either missing the point or you just want to reply with anything. Gconf is not a way to change things. Yes, I AM using it, but that's not my point. My point is: the amount of settings you can set in Gnome via UI is way too low. People don't want to mess with gconf to set things up. Is this how you'd sell for example a TV to people: well, you can change channels on the remote, but you have to open it and use a screwdriver to set brightness and contrast? You need to realise that if Gnome/Linux is to be used by more and more people, people need to lose the geeky way of thinking about things, if you produce a product, it doesn't matter if you think it's OK, it's what customers think. Not everyone can compile a kernel, edit some .whatever file from terminal and use gconf to search and set things. Remember the MOM test, a VERY important part of every consumer product development.
Edited 2007-05-18 07:18




Member since:
2005-07-06
gconf? Are you using regedit to set stuff in Windows?