
Some of the changes in the upcoming release of Windows Server 2008 are a response to features and performance advantages that have made Linux an attractive option to Microsoft customers. One of these is the fact that Linux has less of a surface area, which led customers to believe that Linux is inherently more secure, Bill Laing, the general manager for Microsoft's Windows Server division, told eWEEK.
"Having less surface area does reduce the servicing and the amount of code you have running and exposed, so we have done a lot of work in 2008 to make the system more modular. There are more than 30 components not installed by default, which is a huge change," Laing said.
"We also have server core, which doesn't have the GUI, so I would say that is a response to the options people had with Linux that they didn't have with Windows."
Member since:
2005-11-13
I mean come on now. You can't believe those stupid 1990's processes like slipstreaming and keeping the i386 folder on the network and crap are anywhere near close to being as easy as Apt or Yum? You not that blinded by MS's light are you?
I never claimed it was easy compared to anything. You are the one assuming I was comparing it to linux.
I was simply pointing out that accessing the i386 folder was not as complicated an ordeal as you apparently have made it in your organization.