Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st May 2007 13:40 UTC, submitted by Laurence
Hardware, Embedded Systems Chip-maker Intel "should be ashamed of itself" for efforts to undermine the USD 100 laptop initiative, according to its founder Nicholas Negroponte. He accused Intel of selling its own cut-price laptop - the Classmate - below cost to drive him out of markets. Professor Negroponte, who aims to distribute millions of laptops to kids in developing countries, said Intel had hurt his mission "enormously".
Thread beginning with comment 241948
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: But I don't understand
by Excel Hearts Choi on Mon 21st May 2007 13:51 UTC in reply to "But I don't understand"
Excel Hearts Choi
Member since:
2006-07-08

Maybe it is the cynic in me, but I feel that Intel is out to make money rather than help developing countries. I met some of the OLPC people at this year's FUDCon Boston, and they seem to be generally concerned with helping others than helping their shareholders.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[2]: But I don't understand
by Budd on Mon 21st May 2007 14:02 in reply to "RE: But I don't understand"
Budd Member since:
2005-07-08

I'm sure Intel is after the money,but in the end what matters is the fact that they are selling a cheap laptop.Which,mind you,runs Windows and Linux. I don't know which is better (never touched one of these) but I suspect they are pretty much the same. morally, Negroponte & Co should have first option. Unfortunately , money is always made in these companies. And people look first at this : money.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

DigitalAxis Member since:
2005-08-28

Well, from what I can tell it looks like the Classmate PC is a stripped-down conventional laptop rather than a totally new design like the OLPC (for better or worse). There's no interesting display, a tiny touchpad, a much more power-hungry processor (which, still, will go over fine in second-world countries), and they don't mention any of the wireless mesh. I believe the projected cost of the Classmate PC is still $250, which is a somewhat significant increase over the $175 XO.

Other than that, they are pretty similar. I don't know about Negroponte yelling at them for this; it seems like the OLPC still has its own considerable appeal for more rural markets, provided they get the human-power charger working.

As for software, both of them seem to be relying on local educators and the community in that country to provide targeted and appropriate content for the children.

This is my main worry for both of them: The OLPC in particular is still finalizing and working the kinks out of its hardware, and they've hit the magical trip-point where they're going to start producing these things... Where is the content? If these are educational devices you need time to write the educational software and activities.

I haven't seen much said about any advance copies being sent out to governments interested in purchasing these laptops so their educational professionals can create software for them. No, they're already planning on shipping en masse.

Edited 2007-05-21 15:39

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[3]: But I don't understand
by l3v1 on Mon 21st May 2007 16:36 in reply to "RE[2]: But I don't understand"
l3v1 Member since:
2005-07-06

Unfortunately , money is always made in these companies

Thing is, if someone with limited resources brings up money and resources to create something which will help people, and babysit this idea all the way from idea to reality, that is something to be proud of and support. When a company recognizes that this idea has profit potentials and recreates the idea with pretty much no effort relatively, then undercuts the pricing to steal the "market" then that's not something to be proud of. If they would've taken the road to support the original project, then that would've been a wholly different story.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: But I don't understand
by Spellcheck on Mon 21st May 2007 16:47 in reply to "RE: But I don't understand"
Spellcheck Member since:
2007-01-20

If it helps and they make money, there's a clear market for the technology: that means that there is incentive to supply for the market. That would be a shame, I guess, for Mr. Ego-ponte.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

Windows Sucks Member since:
2005-11-10

If that was the case then why didn't Intel do this years ago?

Because Mr Ego-ponte came up with the idea, made the plan, put it into effect and is about to make it happen.

When he came up with the idea Intel and MS were laughing.

Now the reality of 200 Million or more new Linux and AMD users scares the CRAP out of Craptel and Microcrap.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[2]: But I don't understand
by vimh on Mon 21st May 2007 17:01 in reply to "RE: But I don't understand"
vimh Member since:
2006-02-04

Perhaps the ends justify the means? What if Intel just wants to make money? What if the OLPC can't compete? What if kids in developing countries get tools that could help them learn? What if Nicholas Negroponte is jumping at shadows?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

Windows Sucks Member since:
2005-11-10

Mr Negroponte is upset because he got a lot of countries on board to buy OLPC's.

Now when they goes back to these countries to actually get them to follow through with their offers, they all say that Intel has visited and we are ether now not sure what we want to do OR we have changed our minds.

He is not jumping at shadows, this is what he sees.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: But I don't understand
by ferrels on Mon 21st May 2007 17:40 in reply to "RE: But I don't understand"
ferrels Member since:
2006-08-15

I don't think you're being cynical at all. You are absolutely correct. It's Intel's job to make money/profit, not run charities. Anyone who thinks otherwise is mistaken.

Intel has no incentive to be charitable unless governments develop an incentive for them, such as tax breaks for donating equipment, etc....

Intel could simply have chosen to ignore the $100 USD Laptop, but instead they have chosen to take the low-road and work against it. Just one more reason for me to buy AMD products......

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

Windows Sucks Member since:
2005-11-10

Why didn't Intel help OLPC and come out with a processor that was as good, if not better then AMD's and then offer to put it into OLPC and help OLPC with funding etc.

To come out with a product aimed right at the OLPC is low, really low. :-(

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2