Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st May 2007 13:40 UTC, submitted by Laurence
Hardware, Embedded Systems Chip-maker Intel "should be ashamed of itself" for efforts to undermine the USD 100 laptop initiative, according to its founder Nicholas Negroponte. He accused Intel of selling its own cut-price laptop - the Classmate - below cost to drive him out of markets. Professor Negroponte, who aims to distribute millions of laptops to kids in developing countries, said Intel had hurt his mission "enormously".
Thread beginning with comment 242019
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: But I don't understand
by Windows Sucks on Mon 21st May 2007 16:58 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: But I don't understand"
Windows Sucks
Member since:
2005-11-10

If that was the case then why didn't Intel do this years ago?

Because Mr Ego-ponte came up with the idea, made the plan, put it into effect and is about to make it happen.

When he came up with the idea Intel and MS were laughing.

Now the reality of 200 Million or more new Linux and AMD users scares the CRAP out of Craptel and Microcrap.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

Spellcheck Member since:
2007-01-20

So? At the best, he took a risk so they didn't have to. That's all sunk (as in cost) now and doesn't have anything to do with supposed taking advantage of the potential market.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

Windows Sucks Member since:
2005-11-10

OLPC is a non profit, why would they be thinking of "Market" They are thinking of helping people. But helping people is not free.

Intel is ONLY thinking in terms of market share (Since they will loose money at first to keep OLPC from growing)

That is the problem here. If OLPC was a for profit business and this was straight compitition then that is fine.

But OLPC is non profit and Intel is just doing this for market share. And we know this because as shown on the show last night Intel's marketing documentation compares their product to the OLPC to show their product it better.

If Intel was doing it for the same reason that OLPC was then why put down OLPC?

Edited 2007-05-21 17:40

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1