Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd May 2007 21:05 UTC, submitted by Nix_User
Thread beginning with comment 242667
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Extended partitions ?
by OddFox on Sat 26th May 2007 01:45
in reply to "RE[3]: Extended partitions ?"
You can have 4(primary partitions)*7(slices)=28 "partitions" with FreeBSD on your hard drive. How many you can have with Windows/Linux?
I wasn't aware that there was some sort of limit on extended partitions you could have in your system. Three primary partitions, one extended and as many logicals as you can handle. I've seen people with upwards of ~60 partitions.
Extended partitions is *LAME*- end of story.
I'm not seeing enough difference between the two schemes for it to matter much to me, all I can see is the BSD camps aren't going to give up their slices anytime soon even though nobody else uses the scheme AFAIK.




Member since:
2006-05-19
Being able to split a hard-disk into more than four partitions is definitely a feature, and one I want and use a lot. Where it came from doesn't matter -- it's there, and it's supported well in Windows and in Linux. But not BSD.
You can have 4(primary partitions)*7(slices)=28 "partitions" with FreeBSD on your hard drive. How many you can have with Windows/Linux?
I had cleared out an extended partition, and the installer didn't want to know.
That was a bug that noone encountered during beta and RC testing- now it is fixed.
Extended partitions is *LAME*- end of story.