Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 23rd May 2007 09:13 UTC
Often I complain that GTK+ documentation (non-reference) is non-existent. The few GTK+ books that were ever written are now old and most of their included source code does not even compile anymore. All hail "Foundations of GTK+ Development" by Andrew Krause.
Thread beginning with comment 242720
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-02-20
>GTK# is extremely dangerous. It's inviting lawsuit,
>or intimidation and/or extortion from Microsoft.
Why? Come on, that's FUD. GTK# is NOT copying a Microsoft product. If GTK+ itself is NOT threatened, then why is a thin wrapper using a de jure standardised language threatened?
If there are any problems, it will be in the WindowsForms or ASP.Net side or other stuff that isn't in the ECMA standard.
Give Microsoft *some* credit for open standardisation where they've done it.
> The recent Fortune magazine article, which contains
> MS's latest patent threats, makes this crystal clear.
Go-one, be specific. MS can threaten wherever they have patents, but GTK# is no more and no less likely to be infringing than any random bit of code, so far as I can see.
James