Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd May 2007 23:50 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 243022
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Yes, but at the same time, look at their arc process; rather than simply merging in code, and working out the issues later; its actually tested; making sure that the code is up to the coding standards set by the OpenSolaris community. If it means that some impatient submitters don't come on board, then so be it, its a small price to pay to maintain code quality.
Oh, and in reply to the, quite frankly, bullcrap spread by Butters, Sun *DOES NOT CONTROL* OpenSolaris - they are but a couple of players on the OpenSolaris board; OpenSolaris is now overwhelmingly controlled by the community *NOT* Sun.
This is more anti-Sun rhetoric from IBM and IBM employees; they've now got nothing to whine about now; Java is being opensourced, Solaris is being opensourced and ported to PowerPC and x86 support is improving.
IBM would like you to think that Sun is dying, that SPARC is dying, that Sun isn't committed to Solaris or x86. As rapper said "don't believe the hype" - this is the case with IBM. Don't believe the hype, look at the facts.