Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th May 2007 15:07 UTC, submitted by PlatformAgnostic
Thread beginning with comment 243694
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Oh yeah, because a modular compatiblity system that isn't hard-coded is such a mess
It's by no means modular. It does various specific, and probably unspeakable, things right down to a per-application basis - and it seems to modify the system in ways which makes an application think it is running under another version of Windows. DOSBox does a better job of this.
It's not as if this is merely a compatibility library that makes previous versions of components available to applications that need them.







Member since:
2005-07-06
Oh yeah, because a modular compatiblity system that isn't hard-coded is such a mess :rolleyes: