Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th May 2007 21:07 UTC
Windows "There are a myriad of both subtle and fundamental differences in the basic architecture of Windows Server 2008, which could dramatically change not only the way it's used in the enterprise, but also the logical and physical structure of networks where it's the dominant OS. The abilities to consolidate servers, to manage hardware more effectively, to remotely manage hardware without the graphical traffic, and to radically alter the system security model, could present a more compelling argument for customers to plan their WS2K8 migrations now, than the arguments for moving from Windows 2000 to Server 2003."
Thread beginning with comment 243953
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: And yet again
by JamesG on Tue 29th May 2007 23:37 UTC in reply to "And yet again"
JamesG
Member since:
2007-05-17

|Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to |reinvent it, poorly.
|
|<author>HenrySpencer


Those who do not understand the internet are condemned to troll it, poorly.

Me.

Edited 2007-05-29 23:38

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: And yet again
by bailey86 on Wed 30th May 2007 08:47 in reply to "RE: And yet again"
bailey86 Member since:
2005-10-14

I think my point is perfectly valid - one of the points even explains it clearly.

<quote>
#1: Server Core. Here is where the world could really change for Microsoft going forward: Imagine a cluster of low-overhead, virtualized, GUI-free server OSes running core roles like DHCP and DNS in protected environments, all to themselves, managed by way of a single terminal.

If you're a Unix or Linux admin, you might say we wouldn't have to waste time with imagining. But one of Windows' simple but real problems as a server OS over the past decade has been that it's Windows. Why, admins ask, would a server need to deploy 32-bit color drivers and DirectX and ADO and OLE, when they won't be used to run user applications? Why must Windows always bring its windows baggage with it wherever it goes?
</quote>

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: And yet again
by Soulbender on Wed 30th May 2007 09:19 in reply to "RE[2]: And yet again"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

"Imagine a cluster of low-overhead, virtualized, GUI-free server OSes running core roles like DHCP and DNS in protected environments, all to themselves, managed by way of a single terminal."

The only "new" thing about this would be that it would be running Windows instead of Linux/BSD/QNX/Whatever.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2