Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 30th May 2007 09:51 UTC, submitted by martini
Thread beginning with comment 244123
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: OS/2 relevancy? Yes
by mhgardner on Wed 30th May 2007 16:57
in reply to "RE[2]: OS/2 relevancy? Yes"
<hee hee>
I was once a devoted OS/2 user. Loved it, but I eventually had to move away from it. Sure, some people still use it, I can still boot it up sometimes for sentimental reasons (in a virtual machine on my intel Mac) and I couldn't go back to using it on a day to day basis.
...
This sounds like a "Dear John" letter! It wasn't her(OS/2) it was you!
Edited 2007-05-30 16:59




Member since:
2005-07-06
I was once a devoted OS/2 user. Loved it, but I eventually had to move away from it. Sure, some people still use it, I can still boot it up sometimes for sentimental reasons (in a virtual machine on my intel Mac) and I couldn't go back to using it on a day to day basis.
I remember it with a great deal of fondness, but both the world and I have moved on, not because OS/2 was itself a bad OS, but because IBM refused to maintain and improve it so that it could move into the 21st century.
I went to windows, left that behind too. Went to Linux, and found that interesting enough that I still use it regularly, but when Apple moved to the unix based OS X, I found my new computing home, and unless Apple does something really stupid, I don't think I will be going anywhere from here for a long long time to come.