Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Jun 2007 14:37 UTC, submitted by Alexandros Roussos
Thread beginning with comment 245607
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
@Lambda.
You know as well an anyone that Apple's notebooks are thinner than any other. Hence the "more features per cubic inch". What's there to prove?
Considering "design". In my native language (dutch) the word means slightly more than just good looks, it also means better function beacuse of choices made by Apple other than what hardware has been picked from Intel's and Nvidea's the shelves.
Cost:
You are forgetting TCO. As far as I know that's one of the other 'objective' ways.





Member since:
2006-07-28
A sigh doesn't prove anything
You're the one that brought up "design".
Actually, there's only one objective way. And I already know that a similarly equipped Dell is less expensive than the same PC MacBook. That's just fact. I'll pay more to be able to use OSX, but I'm not going to lie to myself and others about what's going on.
You pay more for the hardware in order to have the pleasure to use OSX. There's nothing wrong with that, but let's be honest.
If we're just talking hardware, then Dell will beat Apple everyday by a large margin. I'm not talking Dell list price here.
Listen, coming from a Unix background, I like OSX. It gives me something that Linux (Gnome/KDE) will never be able to do. But I'm not entering the reality distortion field just because I use OSX.