Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Jun 2007 20:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 245859
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.






Member since:
2006-04-09
@ HPReg
QUOTE: "My understanding is that Parallels Desktop 3.0 (private beta) has multiple snapshots."
Yes they have, now the question is (and I asked this before) will VMware enforce any of the 13 (is that number correct?) software patents (specially Patent 6795966) against Parallels? I'm assuming they won't but I would like to get an insider opinion about this.
QUOTE: "I guess we can now conclude that this whole snapshot patent issue was just FUD. The only question is: whose intesrest is it to spread this FUD?"
Listen, if you work for VMware and think of starting pointing out legit questions as being FUD, then you won't make many friends along the road... I raised some legit questions based on facts. It is not FUD and I am not the boogey man.
@ Karrick
QUOTE: "(2) If you want to whine about the broken US Patent system, there are **plenty** of places to take your discord." AND "(4) Kudos to ChipX86 to stepping into OSNews to candidly answer a few questions. How often do we see that sort of developer<->user interaction in the commercial software industry?"
How can you praise developer<->user interation when you accuse people raising legit questions of being whining?
@ dwave
QUOTE: "Software patents are not illegal in the EU - There just isn't a framework of laws yet to permit them."
Sorry but you are mistaken, software patents are illegal in the EU: Article 52 EPC excludes "programs for computers" from patentability (Art. 52(2)) to the extent that a patent application relates to a computer program "as such" (Art. 52(3))
http://www.european-patent-office.org/legal/epc/e/ar52.html