Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Jun 2007 20:50 UTC, submitted by Francis Kuntz
Thread beginning with comment 245887
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: I assume this is a good thing ...
by phoenix on Fri 8th Jun 2007 15:33
in reply to "RE[3]: I assume this is a good thing ..."
ZFS is *very* RAM hungry. Using it on 32-bit systems with 512 MB or less can lead to kernel panics. The sweat spot seems to be around/above 1 GB of RAM.
On 64-bit systems, it's a lot smoother and runs better, even with just 512 MB RAM.
It can also lead to a lot of disk I/O.
See the archives of the FreeBSD stable and current mailing lists for more info (mostly FreeBSD specific, but with links to Solaris info).




Member since:
2006-04-09
@ Chicobaud
If you read in the end of my comment, I say that ZFS providing a much more optimized I/O and disk operation the battery life time should actually improve quite significantly.
Now that Apple is also fitting LED displays and Intel delivering even more efficient less power-hungry CPUs, I believe generally the battery life can improve a lot.
Remember this is a file system, not a piece of hardware or an application.
Edited 2007-06-07 13:37