To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That's exactly what I was thinking: what if MS is actually showing these companies what they're talking about ? It would surely bring more credibility to their claims -- if the claims are valid ayways.
On the other hand, what if MS is just somehow getting those companies to agree, in order to get the rest of the IT world thinking just like the above conclusion ?
Things are messy. Really messy, these days... and I can't still find any reliable source about how software patent laws apply here in Brazil. Anyone have a clue?
"
I do see where you are coming from and if thats the case then MS have a *cunning tactic there (basically picking companies out one by one and scare them sh*tless until everyone follows suit). They'll gain more this way than a long and expensive, yet legitimate court battle.
* I say 'cunning' but what I really mean is 'evil'.
MS pays these companies much more than they give MS in royalties (for now, anyways...) though. You rally have to wonder why they would give up all their patents to a vicious competitor just for a few hundred million though. Perhaps just greedy and thinking in the short term blip on their financial statements?
Edited 2007-06-08 18:33




Member since:
2005-06-29
It seems absurd for LG to surrender some of their intellectual property to MS simply because MS make unproven accusations about their patents.
That's my point. All I can think of is that the patent claim actualy *shock gasp horror* holds any water.