Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Jun 2007 15:01 UTC, submitted by AdministratorX
Thread beginning with comment 246330
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Breaking story...
by sappyvcv on Fri 8th Jun 2007 18:47
in reply to "RE[4]: Breaking story..."
If it deals with GPLv2 sofware, then that patent license doesn't apply to them distributing Linux as well as paying money to MS for use of Linux, or else they run into Section 7 trouble, don't they? And then they can't use GPLv3 software (as the draft currently stands) unless they change the discriminatory patent license's terms as they apply to GPLv3 software.
RE[6]: Breaking story...
by archiesteel on Fri 8th Jun 2007 19:18
in reply to "RE[5]: Breaking story..."




Member since:
2005-07-02
Not really. If it was only a matter of MS buying intellectual rights from LG, they wouldn't have included the "patent amnesty" clause. This part of the deal is clearly meant to give weight to MS's patent ploy against Linux and FOSS.
It's FUD, pure and simple.