Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Jun 2007 10:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 246333
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I wouldn't call implementing a 6000 pages (with a lot of reference to how other applications behaves) something easy to implement. I really doubt OOXML will be correctly supported in the near future, but it's possible that it will be better than the binary Office files. But what we advocates is to keep the pressure on MsOffice and government to really support ISO and open standard like ODF for interoperability. That's why even with the availability of the OOXML specification, not much effort will be put to support it.
I really doubt OOXML will be correctly supported in the near future, but it's possible that it will be better than the binary Office files.
I think he is referring to the thread on koffice-devel about Microsoft releasing specifications of its old formats, or new licencing terms for them






Member since:
2005-07-07
Now you're right, they didn't want to spend a lot of energy on the 'old' MS Word format. BUT... apparently, Microsoft released the specs for their older formats!!! So it has become a lot easier to support it, thus there is hope ;-)