To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
nv is provided by nVidia to Xorg, and only they can maintain it. Nouveau is not using any nv code (in fact they based off a BeOS/Haiku reverse eng'd nvidia 3d driver) because nv code was obfuscated in 1999, maybe done to prevent 3d use.
I saw a mailing list link a few days ago where Keith Packard said he was trying to get Intel to release the new specifications for new GMA chipsets...
Nouveau is not using any nv code
That's not true. DDX part (xf86-video-nouveau) is based on nv driver. If you don't believe me, you can look at any source file and read copyright info (for instance http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=nouveau/xf86-video-nouveau.git;a=b... ). Nouveau developers were deobfuscating nv source code (it's still in the TODO list -> http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/ToDo ). More information here -> http://airlied.livejournal.com/34017.html





Member since:
2005-07-24
Just throwing out a few questions on things that surprised me from the article:
1. Lastest Intel GMA chipsets do not have specs released? I thought they did.
2. 2D nv driver is *provided* by NVidia? I thought that the nv driver was a reverse enginieering effort. (Not to be confused with the 2D/3D Nouveau effort.)
3. Original R200 specs from ATI were provided to only a few people, under NDA, and were quite incomplete. I didn't know that, but it really shouldn't... and doesn't... surprise me.