Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Jun 2007 15:01 UTC, submitted by AdministratorX
Thread beginning with comment 246549
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[18]: Breaking story...
by segedunum on Sat 9th Jun 2007 14:13
in reply to "RE[17]: Breaking story..."
Fine, if you want to go on agreeing with an analogy that could be argued poor at best and not at all at worst, go ahead.
In terms of what Microsoft is trying to do, the analogy is perfectly correct and it's perfectly reasonable to draw comparisons. It's been explained to you why. Giving one line answers and saying that it's a poor analogy, after all the explanation given, does not make it so I'm afraid.
Man, this is like arguing with a bunch of monkeys.
Whatever sweetheart. Have yourself a banana :-).
Edited 2007-06-09 14:13
RE[19]: Breaking story...
by sappyvcv on Sat 9th Jun 2007 14:15
in reply to "RE[18]: Breaking story..."
RE[18]: Breaking story...
by archiesteel on Sat 9th Jun 2007 17:02
in reply to "RE[17]: Breaking story..."
Fine, if you want to go on agreeing with an analogy that could be argued poor at best and not at all at worst, go ahead.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the quality of the analogy. I think it's good at best and adequate at worst.
Man, this is like arguing with a bunch of monkeys.
Just because you're too biased towards Microsoft to appreciate a good analogy doesn't make monkeys out of us.






Member since:
2005-07-06
Fine, if you want to go on agreeing with an analogy that could be argued poor at best and not at all at worst, go ahead.
Man, this is like arguing with a bunch of monkeys.
Edited 2007-06-09 13:20