Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Jun 2007 17:08 UTC, submitted by E. Stride
Thread beginning with comment 246947
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Notice that they said "revenue market share"
by TBPrince on Mon 11th Jun 2007 21:46
in reply to "RE[9]: Notice that they said "revenue market share""
The EU isn't going after MS because it has a dominant position on the Server Market. That was MollyC's assertion, but the truth is more complex than that.
Definitely more complex, but Microsoft will bow now because they cannot afford to loose EU market. And how highly publicized "big migrations" showed, Linux is not an alternative good enough. I wouldn't be surprised if EU winks to Solaris now that it is open.
RE[11]: Notice that they said "revenue market share"
by archiesteel on Mon 11th Jun 2007 22:01
in reply to "RE[10]: Notice that they said "revenue market share""
And how highly publicized "big migrations" showed, Linux is not an alternative good enough.
Actually, it *is* a good alternative, which is why "big migrations" as you call them continue to happen.
BTW, the FUD about Munich is getting old. They had problems at the start (being trailblazers of sorts), but things are much smoother now, and the Munich migration can be said to be success (despite Microsoft's propaganda machine portraying it as a failure).







Member since:
2005-07-02
The EU isn't going after MS because it has a dominant position on the Server Market. That was MollyC's assertion, but the truth is more complex than that.
That requires so many leaps of logic, it's like being inside the mind of a Microsoft marketroid.