Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Tue 12th Jun 2007 01:16 UTC
When Steve Jobs mentioned a few weeks ago that there will be "some sort of app development" for the iPhone, everyone assumed he meant widgets. Widgets are less powerful than native applications, and depending on the underlying OS hooks offered, they can be even less powerful than J2ME apps. But when Jobs came out today to outright sell us Web 2.0 and said that "no SDK required", I felt cheated.
Thread beginning with comment 247073
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-06-28
Maybe. But users want applications. You highly disregard this.
I suggest you go read my archives of my blog. There, you will find information about my brother, an honest working electrician, who shun away the Linux touchscreen "wow-your-friends" cellphone I sent him last year because it wouldn't run any third party native apps (Motorola wouldn't release their SDK). Additionally, my brother can not afford to pay for GPRS and doesn't have WiFi at home (DSL is very expensive in Greece). In that respect, the iPhone is a worse phone for him than the Motorola Linux one was, as the iPhone can't even run J2ME, let alone native apps or Widgets.
Don't underestimate what people need these days.
Member since:2007-03-30
Member since:
2005-11-21
How many Consumers base the purchase of their Phone on what sort of SDK it offers?
Answer: Developers who double as Consumers and they don't even represent a fraction of 1% who purchase phones.