To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I took _very_ quick look, the thing is that each time I see other companies complaining about MS products I see people who are talking about poor users who are forced by MS to use IE / WMP and stuff like that, I believe that MS has right to make Windows or anything else the way they like, You can love or hate Windows but no one forces You to buy or use it. If MS can't make Windows the way they like than where is the freedom? Each time I see slogan "MS is bad because it forces users to [random stuff]" and scratch my head and think that people got the wrong end of the problem, the problem is not in MS doing things the way they like because MS is a company and each and every company (including google) will try to squeeze every $ out of You, when there are few companies trying to sell You the same thing they must try real hard so You will but it, that is quite simple, but people are complaining to MS that Windows does this or that, don't like it? Don't buy it. And if You need windows because Your software can't run on anything else than Windows than complain to the one who made that software so that they port it to other OS. As long as MS is the only one to complain to we all prove that Windows is the only OS out there that should be used.
I'm talking about perfect world, I know, I'm just curious how far from it are we now.
Edited 2007-06-12 21:05
I agree on this: "As long as MS is the only one to complain to we all prove that Windows is the only OS out there that should be used."
My take is:
1) Antitrust legislation is broken. It shouldn't be needed. Monopolies don't rise because of lack of antitrust legislation. They rise because of monopoly-friendly legislation, which takes us to..
2) IP law is equally broken. Especially (but not exclusively) copyright law and software patents. They are a major instrument of vendor lock-in and subsequent monopoly.
Now, they say "two wrongs don't make a right" but I prefer a doubly-broken, evenly crappy legal system rather than a singly-broken, unbalanced legal system which is a monopolist's dream. Frankly, I don't care much whether Google or Microsoft is in the right under this dumb legislation.
BTW, I'm glad we have no software patent laws in Europe for the moment.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Did you even read the article?