Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 12th Jun 2007 19:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 247481
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-07
A filesystem isn't something you can just yank out of the OS at a whim. If they were planning on supporting ZFS, the code should already be in place.
However, I'm not getting my hopes up. I've wanted to use UFS natively instead of HFS+ since Jaguar. I mean, a filesystem that doesn't have capitalization (!!). However, my efforts have always been thwarted since UFS apparently doesn't handle resource forks in the same way as HFS+. While most applications would work, there are a significant number that fail.
The impression I get is that HFS+ is so ingrained into OS X that if ZFS is truly supported, it will be no small feat to have this feature pulled. It is way more likely that Schwartz just got over excited when he heard that ZFS was going to be "supported".