Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jun 2007 10:31 UTC, submitted by Gary Driggs
Thread beginning with comment 247653
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: You don't seem to understand the product.
by Rayz on Thu 14th Jun 2007 09:51
in reply to "RE: You don't seem to understand the product."
Of course the .Mac upgrade coupled with Leapord's backup features does exactly the same thing.
I don't think it is quite the same. From what I understand, the 'Back to Mac' stuff will allow you to access and copy files to and from your Mac. So I imagine that your home mac disk will appear on the desktop of whichever Mac you are running it from.
The WHS thing is more of a remote desktop function, so you can do anything on your computer (copy files, run applications) as though you were sitting in front of it.
That's how I understand it anyway.
The other difference is that the remote access for WHS is free; to do the remote thing with Apple will require a .Mac account which will set you back $99 a year.
RE[3]: You don't seem to understand the product.
by CPUGuy on Thu 14th Jun 2007 10:56
in reply to "RE[2]: You don't seem to understand the product."






Member since:
2005-07-06
Yeah, it's a pretty nice setup, wonder how much it will cost...
Of course the .Mac upgrade coupled with Leapord's backup features does exactly the same thing.