Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Jun 2007 18:38 UTC, submitted by AdamW
Thread beginning with comment 249202
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-02-17
Linux doesn't use Microsoft's code.
If Microsoft wants to charge Linux users for Microsoft codecs, then Microsoft should offer said codecs for sale to Linux users.
Currently, Microsoft doesn't offer anything for sale for Linux.
Now, since Linux doesn't use Microsoft's code, and there is no code from Microsoft for Linux on offer for sale, what exactly does Microsoft possibly imagine any Linux user should pay Microsoft for?
This is the question.
Even Microsoft murmurs of "interoperability" are all about "you do the work to code our formats on Linux and pay us for your efforts".
Never does Microsoft offer to do anything for Linux, other than let Linux users pay Microsoft.
Thanks, but no thanks Microsoft. I'll skip that deal if you don't mind.