Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Fri 22nd Jun 2007 06:08 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 249810
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Did it really take them five years?"
Yet another statement based on the UI.
And as usual: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista
XP is the frame of reference - not Linux.
Agree. XP is Vista's main competitor.
"Yet another statement based on the UI."
How is this so wrong? Significant changes in the UI are generally all that the end-user notices versus Win XP. If nothing dramatic enough has changed or n "killer feature" is new _and_ easily usable, then people aren't going to switch. Simple as that.






Member since:
2006-01-04
For most people the choice to select Vista is not a choice about Windows vs. Linux. For most people the choice is down to XP vs. Vista.
As for the differences between XP and Vista I can only say: "Did it really take them five years?"
Vista is in many ways a nice OS, and in some ways a very annoying OS. But personally, it is not at all clear that Vista is the superior OS compared to XP.
XP is the frame of reference - not Linux.