Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 23rd Jun 2007 20:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 250212
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Working great now but...
by JrezIN on Sun 24th Jun 2007 13:40
in reply to "RE[3]: Working great now but..."
Fonts look the same in OS X as they look in Safari. I guess it is a matter of preference/getting used to.
Same fonts look the same, the thing is... MacOS X has original fonts optimized for its rendering engine and Windows has (newer) fonts optimized for its engine (and a engine that works well with older not designed to cleartype). One won't work 'well as' using the other fonts...
RE[5]: Working great now but...
by evangs on Sun 24th Jun 2007 18:48
in reply to "RE[4]: Working great now but..."






Member since:
2005-09-17
> The reason as there font rendering works "ok" in MacOS X are the fonts installed in the system designed for this system, but I don't think the result is quite up to the same final quality working on Windows
They work as OK (or as bad) in Mac OS X as they do in Safari for Windows. Windows renderer prefers sharpness by distorting fonts so as to make them stick to absolute pixel coordinates, at the expense of their original shape; Mac OS X (and Safari's) renderer prefers honoring the typeface original shape at the expense of having to antialias vertical and horizontal lines.
Fonts look the same in OS X as they look in Safari. I guess it is a matter of preference/getting used to.