Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th Jun 2007 13:44 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces Federkiel writes: "People working with Apple computers are used to a very consistent user experience. For a large part this stems from the fact that the Lisa type of GUI does not have the fight between MDI and SDI. The question simply never arises, because the Lisa type of GUI does not offer the choice to create either of both; it's something different all along. I usually think of it as 'MDI on steroids unified with a window manager'. It virtually includes all benefits of a SDI and and the benefits of an MDI." Read on for how I feel about this age-old discussion.
E-mail Print r 0   · Read More · 78 Comment(s)
Thread beginning with comment 250327
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: That's only a part of it
by Doc Pain on Sun 24th Jun 2007 21:59 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: That's only a part of it"
Doc Pain
Member since:
2006-10-08

"Glad you brought up the midnight/norton commander."

:-)

"Something that's great about the midnight/norton commander is the predictability of it all. After building up some muscle memory, I can manipulate files almost faster than my screen can refresh, people watching me work just see the screen flash a bit ;-)."

Just as an addition: The MC takes into mind that most operations done with files and directories are "source target operations", such as copying, moving or symlinking. The two panels concept seems to be a very good approach here - better than handling files using the edit buffer (^C, ^X, ^V).

"Combined with the CLI, it's great."

In fact, it is, because it does not limit you. If you need to do an operation that is not supported by the MC, you just call the command you want.

Using mc.ext file, you can even implement the "open on doubleclick" feature here. And for something else, you just enter a command, followed by Meta-Enter (Esc, Enter if no Meta keys available), such as "mplayer -idx Esc Enter Enter" for a malformed AVI file.

"I still use it daily, even though it's a bit dated and clunky in some parts (the editor is only nice because I'm used to it, and very clunky when it comes to copy/pasting for instance)"

The mcedit is one of my favourite editors. It even supports syntax highlighting that you can configure and extend as you wish.

Running in an X Terminal, the MC has mouse support. The downside: You cannot copy / paste via middle mouse buttons from / to other applications.

"I think it worked because of its source/destination system (the 2-panel layout always made clear where your file would end up), the always available command line (it doesn't get in the way of the CLI, on the contrary it augments it), the integrated file search/filtering/comparing, and the integrated editor - and most of all: absolute predictability of the commands."

This is completely correct. Sure, it needs a bit time for the average user to see how this concept works (and why it works), but I knew many people coming from DOS and NC who cried out having nothing similar in their new "Windows". :-)

Reply Parent Score: 2